As mentioned, this is essentially Wanda's story so nobody else is given much to work with. ![]() The multiverse isn't really explored beyond red and green being swapped and pizza balls being "free". Cool scenes like the Illuminati were wasted by being disposed of so quickly. This film feels like the characters are abruptly jumping between several films that have been awkwardly smashed together, unlike the first Doctor Strange film which was extremely focused. It often skips about from one scene to another before they have really been explored or digested, leaving us with only a glimpse. I kept wondering, whose movie is it? Elizabeth Olsen steals the show as Wanda, a corrupted demonic figure who fits the "slasher" role in this film, but her characterisation was also a bit too single-minded to feel like a real person. As my review title states, it's more like Wandavision 2 than Doctor Strange 2. ![]() While I enjoyed the movie overall, it did disappoint some expectations and could have been better. Scarlet Witch has a truly terrifying presence. It was very exciting to explore other worlds and other versions of Dr. The visual design of the universes are very distinct and feels like other worlds have really come to life. ![]() The fight scenes and magic are more creative than in previous films, such as the musical battle. It has the distinct directorial style of Sam Raimi with some quirky camera choices, horror elements and quick montages. I liked this movie and I think it's a fine addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |